The Primary Purpose of a High School in the US

U. S. lavishly aims atomic number 18 non properly preparing kids for the college experience. The primary part of a high domesticate in the United States is to get kids into college. The hangs taught in U. S. high trains be way also lenient in their grading policies and offer students much leeway. High inform courses ar too lenient because high coach initiateers make them that way. integrity good example that proves just how much leeway secondary tuition offers students is that on amount,professors at the high schooltime level accept new document.Of course late papers are marked down,but this policy voids the purpose to having deadlines. Most universities, both usual and toffee-nosed fare strict guidelines on these matters and openly encourage their professors to do the corresponding. I turned in papers a week late in high school and pacify received a grade of 70 % on them. This is coming sanction to hunt me in college because I now fall in a bulky problem meeting deadlines. Although I do not like to acquiesce it, if high school had been stricter in this respect I might not be going through these galore(postnominal) difficulties right now.Most existence high school teachers are astoundingly underpaid and oerworked with sometimes over fifty students in a single classroom. In the last ten years the average class size doubled according to a Time cartridge holder meditate published in 1995 stating that through by the whole solid ground classes have doubled in size. The article mentions that this problem has occurred and will worsen payable to illegal immigration, a population expansion, and flock migration to cities and urban sites.Some students that potentiometer afford a private tutor or the cost of private education follow that path. This is not fair to the majority that cant afford this. Again, the neglect of individual and private interaction between professor ends up resulting in that the student gets adept-half of the ed ucation. For some reason I dont know, the student ends up always paying the price of an inadequate and inefficient public high school system. These statistics offer little incentive and motivation to get teachers to gather up action and lobby for change.Governmental cutbacks have forced many schools to close-fitting lively advanced placement and other college preparatory courses which are springy for the student aspiring for a college education. Public high schools around the nation should establish and enforce stricter college preparatory course of studys because over 50% of high school students that participated in a Time magazine poll conducted in 1996 utter they are interested in pursuing a 4-year college education. The article say that fifty years ago this would not have been the case. If over half the students attending U.S. high schools wish to pursue university education then public schools should tailor their programs to meet the needs and demands of the majority. It is important to know that there is a small percentage of the nation that dont even go to high school as the October 22, 1990 Time Magazine article, Schooling Kids At Home, points out. Parents send their kids to school confident that the school will prepare them well for the future, but overlook that essential programs like SAT preparation and resume skills courses are not offered.How mustiness a school system expect that one study efficiently for exams if they dont show how Cl primaeval people have been studying for many years and there is no set way to study,but it helps to know what are the more or less time efficient ways to review for exams. I feels thats study skills class should be offered in every public high school around the nation. It this implies a great cost then study skills should be incorporated in the daily urriculum or at least taught one time a week during class.The fact is that some time should be set parenthesis for this essential class for which there is great need for. The same concept applies for S. A. T. preparation. Again I propose the conundrum, how must one be expected to pass the S. A. T if schools dont show us how to pass it. legion(predicate) students are left to figure out how to prepare for the exam itself, anticipate they even know how too study. I personally had to pay a costly S. A. T. preparation course that boosted my grade 100 points. The fact that I can pay for the course clearly offers me an unfair advantage.High school courses also lack in encouraging class discussions and debate that are an important aspect of college life as far as I have experienced. Getting by with just doing the work is not full in college. Class participation motivates analytical thinking and class participation. It is a proven scientific fact that when one applies what one learns and actively participates in the learning process, logically one will assimilate and absorb to a greater extent information and retain it for longer periods of time because one is forced to actively become part of the learning process and contribute to the learning environment. umpteen incoming freshmen receive a large shock when faced with such(prenominal) a wide gap that slowly opens up more with the transition of time. As a result of this, many colleges place these freshman in summer courses to polish them up and tie up the loose ends aside from providing a one credit class called Freshman Experience that teaches them such valuable skills as study skills, note-taking, educational activity styles, critical thinking, listening and entrepot skills, test-taking strategies and most important of all, preparing for finals.The fact stands out that if this class were not abruptly necessary, many universities would not require there to take it. Even those people with high S. A. T. scores and a strong academic background must eventually sign up for it because universities know high schools unfortunately dont teach these things, or do not tea ch them well. Courses like this one are in immediate demand. Originally, all the universities I applied to required this course which pretty much justifies that it is in immediate demand.I personally never had a class so comprehensive as to include theses skills vital for college success. Some high schools produce graduates that cannot read or have super poor reading and writing skills. If our high schools were efficient and did look out for the students best interests, people would not graduate without these basic skill that most people agree must me present for the college experience. Colleges should not be teaching basic, elementary skills such as reading and elementary writing.College is not meant to be a grueling and terrible time for a person, but over the years, U. S. high schools have lost their focus and misplaced their priorities producing students that cannot independently contrive themselves successfully. In some extreme cases, kids are committing suicide in college ea rly on because they cant handle the stress produced by their classes and many of the students that quit or do poorly have poor college survival skills. Finally, U. S. igh schools are not adequately preparing kids for the college life. These high schools are too lenient, complacent, financially unstable, overcrowded, and simply inefficient. The curriculum must set higher standards and make the transition a even-textured one. If these changes were implemented,the gap between high school and college education may one day be a thing of the past and once once more the college years will truly be fulfilling and rewarding ones and not cloggy or frustrating.