'Mona Lisa Paper\r'

'Is It Her twin or Sister? An wile collector in 1913 made a disco very that has baffled some historians for some meter now. Huge Blaker, an English art collector found the Isleworth Mona Lisa shortly before creation War I. The Isleworth Mona Lisa is a pic of, what looks to be, a one-year-old Mona Lisa. This paint has been identified as a da Vinci da Vinci painting, further some historians turn over that this cannot be true. With some differences in the paintings they believe it may suck in been another small artist at the eon trying to copy da Vinci.The Isleworth painting is seemed to be with an international consortium while the original painting is kept in Paris five Museum. The famous womanhood is this picture is Lisa del Giocondo. Lisa was from Florence and Tuscany, Italy. She married a cloth and silk merchant in her teenage historic period. Lisa was born in Florence on June 15th, 1479, legion(predicate) think that she was born on a rural property that is though to know been own by the family. Lisa had five children with the merchant named Piero, Camilla, Andrea, Giocondo, and Marietta.Lisas husband, Francesco di Bartilomeo di Zanobi del Giocondo, increased her friendly status because he was from a middle categorize family, while Lisa was from a lower class with no dowry from her family. Francesco was an art lover and commissioned da Vinci for a portrait of his married woman. â€Å"He is thought to puzzle commissioned Lisas portrait to celebrate bother Andrea del Sartos abide and the purchase of the familys home. ” (http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Lisa_del_Giocondo#Mona_Lisa) In the painting in the flipper, Lisa is â€Å" envisioned as a faithful wife by dint of gesture-her right hand rests over her left. ” (http://en. ikipedia. org/wiki/Lisa_del_Giocondo#Mona_Lisa) Da Vinci in addition represented Lisa in uplifted fashion with bootleg article of clothing that would view as come from Spain. This would take a crap not represented Lisa in her family because she would not drive home been adapted to afford these type of clothing with her familys income. Many historians welcome tell that Lisa is wearing dark clothes because she would be mourning the death of her stolon daughter, which, in more manners, is wrong. The painting took da Vinci some time to ratiocination because he received money for the painting The fighting of Anghian, which was offering more money than the portrait of Lisa.Some historians have guessed when da Vinci stainless the painting because he carried it well-nigh with him through-out his later life in France. The guesstimate is most 1516 is when da Vinci finally finished the Mona Lisa. The Isleworth Mona Lisa is what seems to be a younger Lisa, but because we do not have actual proof, that is only an assumption. Historians cannot give an exact epoch as to which this painting was started or even finished because they found the painting in was found with a noble fami ly.After Blaker purchased the painting it was go to Isleworth, England, where the name came from. Whilst the first World War was going on, the Isleworth painting was moved to America for preserving. â€Å"The Portrait eventually made its way back to Europe, where is was analyzed in Italy before being sent to the Swiss bank vault for safekeeping. ” (http://abcnews. go. com/blogs/headlines/2012/09/second-mona-lisa-unveiled-for-first-time-in-40-years/) Since that time period the Mona Lisa Foundation has worked on the painting to jump its authenticity and if da Vinci really painted this portrait. pic] The differences amid these two paintings ar not significant ones, but they are big enough that some may believe that this cannot be a true da Vinci painting. The Isleworth is painted on canvas while the Louvre Mona Lisa was painted on wood. The Isleworth excessively has a very plain background and columns on either stead of the figure, but the Louvre painting seems to be the said(prenominal)(p) background with a lot more expand included and no columns. The sizes of these two painting also is making historians scratch their heads because the Louvre painting is narrower. pic] that there are eerily galore(postnominal) similarities amid the two paintings that have made historians and scientists believe that it had to have been painted by the kindred person. â€Å"It strikes us that in order for that to be so accurate, so meticulously exact, only the person who did one did the other… ” said art historian and Mona Lisa Foundation member Stanley Feldman. (http://abcnews. go. com/blogs/headlines/2012/09/second-mona-lisa-unveiled-for-first-time-in-40-years/) The clothing in the two paintings seems to be of the same high Spanish fashion.The pose shows that Lisa was a loyal wife with her left hand over her right, this pose is that same in both paintings. It took art historians 35 years to conclude their tests on both Mona Lisa paintings. The Mon a Lisa Foundation performed many experiments comparing the two. First the foundation placed the painting side by side and found that Lisa in the Isleworth painting is smaller than she is in the Louvre painting. â€Å"The simple graphic illustrations demonstrate that the figure in the ‘Louvre Version is approximately 10% larger than the figure in the ‘Earlier Version” (http://monalisa. rg/2012/09/10/leonardos-hidden-technique/) The features of Lisa in both of these paintings are exactly the same; with same positions that are suddenly aligned. â€Å"They are dramatically different compositions, and the technique of harmonize and related geometric measurements employed, points to the two portraits having been painted by the same artist; someone intimately well-known(prenominal) with both, and who had the intention to create two different paintings of the same subject”(http://monalisa. org/2012/09/10/leonardos-hidden-technique/)With these two paintings bein g so eerily similar, but also having some taken for granted(predicate) differences, art historians have drooled over these two paintings. The common population knowing the famous Mona Lisa painting in the Louvre, but not knowing until this year that there was another painting of Lisa del Giocondo, and earlier painting. Some historians believe that this paint could not have been done by the famous da Vinci because there were so many copies of the original Mona Lisa, but without doubt that Mona Lisa Foundation has prove them wrong. Over 35 years of test have proven them that both paintings were actually done by da Vinci.\r\n'