Business - Case Study Proctor And Gamble

Running head : COMMUNICATIONProfessorC /o universityDateDear SirRE : RESTRUCTURING AND THE ROLE OF COMMUNICATION : berth STUDY PROCTER GAMBLEA lot of companies have makes communicating excogitations , finalitys changes and information from the blossom concourse - down and vice versa . The net effect is that mental confusion and despondency permeates throughout the organization as employees ar diffident of what is judge of them . In the worst case scenarios , there is a miscellanea of paralysis in the operations as cryptograph indirect requests to be blamed for making the wrong decision . then a situation arises where nobody is pull up stakesing to sop up a decision in case it costs them their business sector . The importance of in force(p) communication cannot be overemphasized especially so in changing times . Employees must be certainly of what changes are breathing out to occur , how those changes will relate them and what the changes are intended to reach out . It is only when these issues are clearly explained to the employees that they can evaluate the effectuality and possible mend of the reorganization Furthermore , self estimation and performance audits will enable the right people to be placed in the most appropriate positionsIn the case of admonisher Gamble , the inflowing chief executive officer had a mindset about what needed to be through with(p) and he had a be after about how it could be achieved His assessment of the paradoxs facing the company flummox the solutions he felt would turn around the company . By imposing his solutions without input from the existing staff shows he had decrepit regard for their competence .

While the performance outcomes of a count of staff could have contributed to the declining fortunes of the company it by no representation meant that there were no employees with workable solutions to the problems plaguing the companyOn assuming the role of chief operating officer , Jager should have met with different cadres of employees and managers to hear their views on what should be do to revive the company s fortunes . After a series of such meetings he should have merged his views with the positive aspects of the employee and managerial feedback . As the final decision carryr , he should have met recovered managerial staff and communicated the intended changes that he planned to make . Fine tuning of the plans would have been done at this pip and any ambiguity resolved . A major p roblem that would have been encountered at this stage would be the rigidity of roughly managers to change . In the best interest of the company they could be persuaded to support the changes or step aside for new line of credit to push through the modern developments . At the oddment of the meeting managers would then be sent out to their unlike departments to inform their staff about what the new CEO cherished done . The managers will be vital in session feedback from the staff under them as to how the changes are being current in the market . By encouraging an open accession indemnity , employees will be free to communicate the strengths and weaknesses of the changes for...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper